conv03_153_graveyard.wav between "directly" and "like", and between "like" and "to" 
"directly": 
ANS (initial):
is there a boundary-related tone?  no. 
is there durational lenghthening? some, more than a word boundary, but strong enough for a 3m? We think not! We propose 2-
RESPONDENT A: I think '1' is ok.
RESPONDENT B: we hear glottalization on "directly", and a 1pr break due to lengthening of final syllable of "directly".
"like":
ANS (Initial) 
is there a boundary-related tone? 
RESPONDENT B: Maybe 
ANS (Initial):
There is some tone, but it could be a pitch accent, could be a phrase accent, or could be both (but a bit short for both) 
RESPONDENT A: I hear no pitch accent, but L- phrase accent
ANS (initial):
Is there duration lengthening?  
RESPONDENT B: Yes 
ANS (initial) 
some, but we're not sure, so:
¥ if tone and length are both due to the pitch accent, then what? 1? can't be, because it's too long. Also can't be 1m because it's too long for 1, and phrase tone is not present 
RESPONDENT A: ItÕs not long enough to be 3.  So, 3-. 
RESPONDENT B: we hear a good level 3 disjuncture  after ÒlikeÓ, but little tonal evidence for a phrase accent. A good example of 3m.
ANS (initial):
¥ also the following "to" of "to the right" shows strong aspiration, and therefore seems like the beginning of a new phrase. Plus note the long closure duration (or silence) between "like" and "to", and also the possible tone reset  on "to" 
RESPONDENT A:
Agree, so I hear an ip boundary after ÔlikeÕ.  So, my labeling is: 
directly like
L+H*    L-
1 3- 
By the way, I hear an ip boundary after ÔgraveyeardÕ (H- with break index 3).                      
RESPONDENT B: We also labeled a L+H* on ÒgraveyardÓ